The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

1. The Defendant and the victim C are all members of the D fishing club.

On March 1, 2013, the Defendant damaged the reputation of the victim by openly pointing out false facts in collusion with the employees of the Defendant Company C, even though the victim C did not have to deduct the company’s money. However, while the bus article E and the name under the “D fishing club,” a member of the D fishing club, is heard, the victim was in favor of the employees of the Defendant Company, and thereby he was in default of the company by deducting the company’s money.”

B. On June 7, 2014, the Defendant damaged the honor of the victim by openly pointing out false facts by stating that “C is unable to pay back the money of our company with its employees and thus making it difficult for the company to pay back to the company,” at the place of fishing place where the same group members 13 of the same group meals at the Yaeng-ri, Yaeng-ri, Yaeng-ri, Yari-ri, Yari-ri

2. Grounds for dismissing the public prosecution; and

(a) Crimes of non-compliance with an intention (Article 312 (2) of the Criminal Act);

B. Withdrawal of wishes to punish C after the prosecution of this case

(c) Judgment dismissing public prosecution (Article 327 subparagraph 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act);