1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. The plaintiff asserts that on March 15, 2018, when the 1934 life was 193 and the 18,038,520 won per bond is paid as contract deposit, the plaintiff should return to the plaintiff, since he/she concluded a sales contract with the defendant for D-building (officetel) E and F, and paid 36,07,040 won per bond as contract deposit.

However, according to the evidence evidence No. 4, the plaintiff was found to have undergone a diagnosis of Gyeongdo disability on July 24, 2019 by G Hospital, but it cannot be deemed that the plaintiff had no mental capacity at the time of entering into the above sales contract, and the above contract cannot be deemed null and void. Thus, the plaintiff's above assertion is without merit.

(B) On November 27, 2019, the Plaintiff asserted that each of the above real estate sales contracts may be revoked on the grounds that the Plaintiff was paid in full or in full after completion of the contract, and the Plaintiff was able to pay monthly rent solely based on the amount of the purchase price of each of the above real estate, based on the evidence submitted by the Plaintiff and the supporting documents received by this court on November 27, 2019, which was after the closing of the argument in this case.

However, there is no evidence to prove the above facts, so the plaintiff's above assertion is without merit.

3. The plaintiff asserts that H and the defendant entered into a sales contract with the plaintiff's old-age, rash, and inless experience, which considerably lost fairness.

However, there is no evidence to prove that the above contract for sale in lots has considerably lost fairness, so the plaintiff's above assertion is without merit.

4. Therefore, the plaintiff's claim of this case is without merit.