1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Details of the disposition;

A. On January 12, 1981, the Plaintiff was first appointed as a local administrative secretary, and served as a public official in general service belonging to the Ministry of Education who promoted to a deputy office on July 1, 2016, and as a director of B University Student Admission Scholarship from January 1, 2018.

① At around 20:00 on March 22, 2018, the Plaintiff: (a) divided the body knee and knee in the victim’s body knee and knee, which were the victim’s knee and knee in both sides of the victim’s left kne, and had the victim’s knee and knee, which were the victim’s kne and knee in both sides, made a sexual humiliation due to physical contact that does not want the victim A and B.

(2) On April 6, 2018, after reporting sexual harassment on March 26, 2018, the Plaintiff violated the procedure for the handling of the instant case by the Child Counseling Center (gender counseling room) at B university students by sending a phone call to the victims, “if the victims are faced with a situation in which the victims are faced with, and if the victims are able to be able to be faced with, the situation in which the victims are faced,” thereby inducing secondary damages, such as having the victims conduct a thorough appraisal.

(2) The Plaintiff’s act constitutes grounds for disciplinary action under Article 78(1) of the State Public Officials Act that violates Article 63 (Duty to Maintain Dignity) of the same Act.

B. On June 2018, the Defendant requested the Central Disciplinary Committee to make a minor disciplinary decision against the Plaintiff for the following reasons, and on August 24, 2018, the Central Disciplinary Committee made a decision of reprimand against the Plaintiff.

C. On September 17, 2018, the Defendant issued a reprimand under Article 78(1) of the State Public Officials Act (hereinafter “instant disposition”) against the Plaintiff on September 17, 2018 upon notification of the result of a disciplinary resolution by the Central Disciplinary Committee.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 4, Eul evidence No. 1, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Whether the instant disposition is lawful

A. The plaintiff.