The judgment of the court below is reversed.

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. The defendant did not inflict any bodily injury by assaulting the victim.

Nevertheless, the judgment of the court below which found the Defendant guilty of the facts charged of this case is erroneous and adversely affected by the judgment.

B. The punishment sentenced by the prosecutor (one million won in penalty) by the court below is too unhued and unjust.

2. Determination

A. As to the assertion of mistake of facts, the lower court also asserted the same as the grounds for appeal as to mistake of facts, but the lower court found the Defendant guilty of the instant facts charged based on the evidence duly admitted and investigated.

⑵ 당 심의 판단 ㈎ 이 사건의 쟁점 피고인이 피해자를 폭행하여 상해를 가하였다는 이 사건 공소사실과 관련하여 당시 이를 목격한 사람이 없는 이상, 위 공소사실에 관한 직접적인 증거로는 피해자의 진술뿐이다.

As long as the defendant contests the above facts charged, whether any of the statements made by the defendant and the victim is reliable or not.

A. The issue of this case is the issue of this case.

In light of the following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and investigated in the court below and the court below's judgment, the judgment of the court below is just and there is an error of law that affected the conclusion of the judgment by misunderstanding the facts as alleged by the defendant.

subsection (b) of this section.

Defendant’s assertion cannot be accepted.

㈏ 피해자 진술의 신빙성 피해자는 경찰 및 검찰 진술에 이어서 원심 증인신문에 이르기까지 대체로 일관되게 이 사건 공소사실에 부합하는 취지의 진술을 하였는데, 직접 폭행을 당한 사람이 아니면 알 수 없는 구체적인 사건의 경위, 폭행의 내용을 진술하고 있다.

Each statement of the victim is consistent with the diagnosis of the injury to the victim and the images of the injured photograph.

Therefore, the injured party.