logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 의정부지방법원 2016.03.09 2015고단2000
사문서위조등
Text

Defendant

B Crimes No. 1-(b)(c) and (d) of the ruling with respect to the crimes of No. 1-A and No. 2(b) of the ruling.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[Criminal Records] Defendant B was sentenced to a suspended sentence of two years for a violation of the Narcotics Control Act at the Seoul Northern District Court on November 7, 2014, and the said judgment became final and conclusive on November 15, 2014.

[2015 Highest 3414]

1. Fraud;

A. On April 15, 2013, the Defendant committed a crime against the victim E in collusion with F, and on the road near the Government Viewing in order to take place at the time of the Government Viewing in the city around 20:00 on April 15, 2013, the Defendant would borrow KRW 170,000 in cash and return the vehicle if he/she pays the borrowed amount within three months.

The phrase “ makes a false statement.”

However, in fact, the Defendant did not intend to return the said vehicle even if the Defendant was paid the borrowed money within the given time limit because the Defendant thought that the Defendant would sell the vehicle to another person by the scoo vehicle in the name of the scoo vehicle from the injured party.

Nevertheless, the Defendant, as such, by deceiving the victim, was delivered to G of the amount equivalent to KRW 13 million owned by Unbrin Korea Co., Ltd. from the damaged party.

B. On May 29, 2015, the Defendant committed a crime against the victim H at a place in which the victim H was not located at the time of the Government around May 29, 2015 and below the address of the Government. The Defendant would return KRW 500,000 to the victim H as security.

“A false statement shall be made, and even on July 7, 2015, the victim shall return the difference of 1150,000 won to the victim.

The phrase “ makes a false statement.”

However, on January 2015, the Defendant had already sold the said vehicle to another person, who is called the vehicle, and thereafter was unaware of the location of the said vehicle, so there was no intention or ability to return the said vehicle even if he received money from the injured party.

Nevertheless, on May 29, 2015, the defendant deceivings the victim and continues to receive 500,000 won from the victim to the account under the name of J on May 29, 2015.

arrow