1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Details, etc. of ruling;

(a) Project approval and the name of the public announcement of the project: The project implementer of the urban planning facility project in Namyang-si (hereinafter referred to as the “instant project”): The public announcement of the project implementation authorization for the Defendant: D ( November 3, 2016), the public notification of the Namyang-si, the public notification of the Namyang-si, the public notification of the Namyang-si ( October 19, 2017), and the public notification of G ( November 9, 2017) in Namyang-si (hereinafter referred to as the “instant project”);

B. Subject to the expropriation ruling by the Gyeonggi-do Regional Land Tribunal on March 26, 2018: The Plaintiff’s share of 174/1392 (hereinafter “instant land”): The starting date of expropriation of KRW 80,445,00: the Plaintiff’s opinion on May 10, 2018: 174/1392 of the Plaintiff’s share of KRW 136 square meters (hereinafter “1 remaining land”), the JJ, 317 square meters (hereinafter “2 remaining land”). The Plaintiff’s share of KRW 100 and KRW 174/1392 of the total land and KRW 248 square meters (hereinafter “the remaining land of this case”): The Plaintiff’s share of KRW 1392 of the Act on Acquisition of and Compensation for Land, etc. for Public Works (hereinafter “the previous land area”) and the previous land area of the same case’s remaining land shall not be deemed to be difficult to be deemed to have been included in the remaining land according to Article 74 of the Enforcement Decree of the same Act.

The contents of the ruling on the claim for expropriation of remaining land: It cannot be deemed significantly difficult to use each remaining land of this case in accordance with its original purpose, considering the location, shape, utilization status, specific use area, etc. of each remaining land of this case.

C. An objection filed by the Central Land Tribunal on January 24, 2019 by the Plaintiff: The Defendant’s opinion to request the acceptance of the Plaintiff’s shares among the remaining land of this case: The remaining land of this case is larger than that of new roads, and entry and exit.