1. The Defendants: KRW 62,161,950 for each Plaintiff and KRW 5% per annum from May 1, 2013 to May 23, 2014.

1. The following facts may be acknowledged in full view of the following facts: Gap evidence 1-1, Gap evidence 2-1, 2-2, Gap evidence 4-1 through 5-7, Gap evidence 11-1 through 5, Eul evidence 12-12, and Eul evidence 12-2.

Around May 2012, the Plaintiff stated that the date of the instant construction contract as “ August 22, 2012.” However, the Plaintiff and the Defendants appears to have no dispute as to the fact that the date of the instant construction contract is around May 2, 2012 (the Plaintiff’s application for modification of the purport of the claim and the cause of the claim, and the preparatory document of the Defendants on April 10, 2014). D, which mutually engages in construction business, entered into the instant construction project as “C,” and the Defendants continued to enter into the instant construction project as “No. 13,300,000 (including value added tax)” from the date of the instant construction contract as “No. 20,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,00,000,00.

(Plaintiff’s application for modification of the purport and cause of the claim on February 7, 2014, and the Defendants’ written brief on April 10, 2014). Between the Plaintiff and the water environmental Dong building located within the construction site, such as the said integrated control building, the steel and the panel.