A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

A public prosecution against the defendant is instituted against intimidation.

Punishment of the crime

"2016 Highest 2890"

1. Around 18:00 on November 1, 2016, the Defendant obstructed the victim’s mother business by force, such as making the victim D (the victim D, 52 years of age), who is in the Seocho-gu, Seocho-gu, Cheongju-si (the 52 years of age), who was under the operation of the “E,” and was living in the third floor while drinking alcohol at the victim’s her hand, sculing the victim’s bat and arm’s length, leading the victim’s hand who want to guide the customer, leading the victim to “breing, taking responsibility within the victim’s hand,” and sound, leading the customer to the customer who was in the influence of force, such as “abreing,” and sound, i.e., causing the victim to die., the victim’s mother business.

2. At around 19:05 on the same day, the Defendant’s interference with the performance of official duties (i.e., “to put a person to commit an alcoholic beverage and threaten a person to commit an alcoholic beverage”; (ii) sees that he will go home from G in the circumstances belonging to the F District of the police station in the Cheongju-gu Police Station, which was called upon 112 report; and (iii) sees that he will go home from G in the circumstances where he belongs to the F District of the police station in charge of the Cheongju-gu, which was called out.

“A police official who had the chest of the above G two times in drinking, interfered with the legitimate execution of his duties concerning the handling of the 112 Report.

around 16:00 on February 25, 2017, the Defendant paid a large room charge of the victim I’s Jel 608 in Cheongju-si, Cheongju-si, Cheongju-si, and entered the room, but the Defendant was on the same day as the time of the leaving room and was on the duty of the victim, and was on the duty of the victim, and was on the duty of the victim, and was on duty by the police officer who was dispatched after receiving the report.

around 21:00 on February 25, 2017, the Defendant said at the above place that “it has been included in the calculation of tax revenues and expenditures,” and received a demand for a request from the injured party by taking advantage of the victim’s identity with the victim under Jel 608, and without the victim’s permission.

However, the defendant did not respond to it and did not comply with the demand of the victim to leave the victim without justifiable reasons until he is arrested by a police officer who was dispatched by the victim's report at around 21:40 on the same day.