logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2017.03.28 2016고단6266
특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(위험운전치상)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who is engaged in the operation of a c 14.5 ton excavation aircraft.

On September 6, 2016, the Defendant driven the above soft machine with alcohol content of 0.139% while under the influence of alcohol at around 20:10 on Sep. 6, 2016, and proceeded with the first line road in front of the E cafeteria located in Osan City D, Osan-si.

In this case, a person engaged in driving of construction machinery has a duty of care to safely drive the construction machinery while keeping the tea.

Nevertheless, the Defendant, while under the influence of alcohol, neglected to do so and neglected to boom the center line, received the part adjacent to the left-hand side of the city bus No. 202 G 202 driving of the victim F(50 years old) who was living normally on the opposite lane of the above boomer as the boomer’s boom.

As a result, the Defendant driven the above so-called so-called so-called “dacter” in a state where it is difficult for the Defendant to drive the said so-called “dacter” due to influence of drinking, and caused the victim’s H (V, 26 years old), to take approximately two-day medical treatment, such as cactinites and tensions requiring approximately two-day medical treatment, to the victim I (V, 41 years old), to suffer damage to the victim’s J (17 years old), to the victim’s Hamop and tensions requiring approximately two-day medical treatment, to the victim’s K (46 years old); to the victim’s Hamopums and tensions requiring approximately two-day medical treatment; to the victim’s Hamopumums and tensions requiring approximately two-day medical treatment; to the victim’s Hamopumumums and 27 years olds and 2 years olds, respectively, to the victim’s Hamop.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made to F prepared by judicial police officers;

1. A report on the detection of a primary driver;

1. The actual survey report and photographs;

1. Each written diagnosis and written confirmation of admission discharge shall be applied 1.

arrow