1. The Defendant’s disposition of expulsion against the Plaintiff on May 17, 2019 is revoked.

2. The costs of the lawsuit are assessed against the defendant.

1. Details of the disposition;

A. The Plaintiff was elected as a certified judicial scrivener operating a certified judicial scrivener office, and as the 7th City/Do council member in the nationwide Do Do Do Do Do election implemented on June 4, 2014, and held office from July 1, 2014 to June 30, 2018, and was elected as the 8th City Do council member in the national Do Do Do Do election implemented on June 13, 2018, and held office as the 4-year Do council member from July 1, 2018.

The 8th City Council member is the plaintiff, C, D, E, F, G, H, I, and J (hereinafter referred to as the "Council member of this case") and the J is the defendant's chairperson.

B. On April 29, 2019, the Korea Press reported the article stating, “The Plaintiff, who is concurrently a certified judicial scrivener, was known to have received KRW 00,000,000 of the fee for each case through a certified judicial scrivener operated in his/her own name. In addition, the Plaintiff’s registration work in the same City B has been several years, and the number of which is less than that of each year is less than that of each year. In particular, the Plaintiff’s problem was revealed not only through the L Bank operating the Si Treasury, but also through the L Bank operating the Si Treasury, and also through the L Bank operating the Si Treasury, which is a means for the certified judicial scrivener to perform the affairs of the Si.” (hereinafter “instant article”).

C. On April 30, 2019, eight (8) members of the instant Assembly, excluding the Defendant’s Chairman J (hereinafter “Defendant’s Chairman”), requested the Defendant’s Speaker to convene a temporary session of the 238th City Council on April 30, 2019, on May 2, 2019, “the date and time of the assembly,” with the grounds for the assembly as “review the composition of the Special Committee on Ethics and the request for disciplinary action against a National Assembly member.”

On April 30, 2019, seven members of the instant council, excluding the Plaintiff and J (hereinafter “instant seven members”), proposed a resolution on the composition of the Special Committee on Ethics (hereinafter “the instant extraordinary session”) to the Defendant’s Speakers ① the 238th City Special Committee on Ethics (hereinafter “instant special session”). ② The instant report violates the contract regarding the instant report.