logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원순천지원 2015.02.03 2014가단71983
대여금
Text

1. Defendant B Co., Ltd., C, and D shall jointly and severally serve as KRW 65,00,000 on the Plaintiff and as from February 4, 2010.

Reasons

Comprehensively taking account of the overall purport of the arguments in Gap evidence Nos. 1 and 2 (including various numbers), the plaintiff prepared a certificate of monetary loan loan contract with defendant Eul on Dec. 20, 2002 as to the amount of KRW 80,000,000 per annum, interest rate of KRW 66% per annum, and the amount of loan with defendant C as joint and several surety on Apr. 16, 2003 as the principal amount of KRW 1775, 200, the creditor, the principal debtor C, the principal debtor C, the principal debtor as joint and several surety, and the interest amount of KRW 66% each month from Jan. 10, 203. The plaintiff may recognize the fact that the plaintiff remitted to the defendant Eul on Apr. 10, 200, KRW 6,000,000, KRW 100,000, KRW 80, Feb. 16, 2012.

In addition to these facts of recognition, the Plaintiff prepared the above notarial deed after deducting KRW 15,00,000,000 paid from the above 80,000 by the above notarial deed on December 20, 202, and claimed damages for delay at the rate of 30% per annum from the rate of 137,82,000 as the Defendant claimed reimbursement. Defendant B, C, and D are jointly and severally liable to pay damages for delay at the rate of 65,00,000 won from the above notarial deed and the validity of the notarial deed to February 3, 2010 (the above 137,82,00 won was appropriated from January 10, 203 to February 3, 2010).

In addition, Defendant C is obligated to pay to the Plaintiff KRW 6,00,000 as well as damages for delay at each rate of KRW 20% per annum as prescribed by the Civil Act from February 29, 2012 to April 28, 2014, which is the delivery date of a copy of each complaint, from April 16, 2012 to April 28, 2014.

The Defendants received 20 million won, 30,000,000 won, and 30,000,000 won, respectively, as an assignment order for claims seizure and assignment order, and Defendant C.

arrow