Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 2,500,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

1. The Defendant violates the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents and the Road Traffic Act is a person engaging in driving a rocketing cargo vehicle;

On July 3, 2012, the Defendant driven the above vehicle at around 13:40 on July 13, 2012, and driven the four-lane road in front of the gallongalian in the Seo-gu Seoul Metropolitan City, Seo-gu, Daejeon toward the direction of the orchard at the 4rd side of the orchard, and changed the course into the four-lane course.

In such cases, a person engaged in driving of a vehicle has a duty of care to prevent the occurrence of an accident by changing the vehicle line through operating direction, etc., giving prior notice of change of course, and taking into account the traffic conditions of the front and rear left, and thereby preventing the occurrence of an accident.

Nevertheless, when the Defendant neglected this and negligently changed the vehicle line as it is, the Defendant fell into the front left side of the vehicle driving by the victim D (the age of 44) who was driving a four-lane to the same side as the other side of the vehicle driving.

Ultimately, the Defendant caused the injury to the victim D, such as catum salt in need of approximately three weeks’ treatment due to the above occupational negligence, and damaged the victim F (the victim f, who is the passenger of the vehicle driving by the Defendant (the 57-year-old age), with approximately two weeks’ treatment, such as catum strings, strings, arms belfings, hand-offs, hand-offs, and salteds, etc., and at the same time, damaged the above catum vehicle in excess of KRW 3,510,826, such as the exchange of the front bater.

2. The Defendant violated the Guarantee of Automobile Accident Compensation Act is the owner of the rocketing automobile.

The Defendant, at the same time and place as above, operated the rocketing automobile that was not covered by mandatory insurance.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement made to D by the police;

1. A survey report on actual condition (1) (2);

1. Mandatory insurance policies;

1. Each written diagnosis;

1. Written estimate;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on accident site photographs;

1. Article 3(1) of the relevant Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents concerning criminal facts;