A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On September 14:30, 2017, the Defendant was faced with a disturbance in the ropoly flusium of the East-gu, the 67-ropoly in Jeju-si. On September 5, 2017, the Defendant was under the control and notification of the violation of the Punishment of Minor Offenses Act (drinking disturbance of drinking) by a policeman belonging to the police station B of the Jeju-dong Police Station B of the Jeju-dong Police Station, the Defendant was under the control and notification of the violation of the Punishment of Minor Offenses Act (divating disturbance of drinking), and was under the control

C's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son continued to interfere

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Application of the police statement protocol law to C

1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. The sentencing of Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act on the grounds of protection and observation is determined as ordered by taking into account the following: (a) the Defendant committed a second offense despite the past record of having been sentenced to a suspended sentence of imprisonment for the same kind of crime in 2014; (b) the degree of assault against public officials; and (c) the Defendant’s age, environment; and (d) the conditions of sentencing