logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 창원지방법원 2016.04.07 2015고합231
특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(뇌물)
Text

Defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four years and by a fine for 90,000,000 won.

The defendant does not pay the above fine.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On August 27, 2009, the Defendant, as the representative director of the management company specialized in improvement projects (ju)L, entered into a reconstruction promotion committee and a management service contract specialized in improvement projects located in the counter of the Changwon-si, Changwon-si.

Between August 2012 and around September, 2012, O, the person in charge of N's original project (M), who is the person in charge of N's original project (M) in the bidding for the construction works of the reconstruction association, shall make public relations to enable L(owner) to become the contractor in relation to the selection of the contractor in the construction works of the said association, and shall make efforts to prepare a quotation for the tender of the construction works in favor of N(owner) when preparing a quotation for the tender of the construction works.

N(State) will arrange for personnel to be selected as a contractor.

Around October 2012, the Defendant responded to the above O’s proposal to the effect that “I wish to give KRW 200 or KRW 300 million to another contractor, and if I wish to give it to the extent, I wish to do so.”

On the other hand, N was selected as a contractor at the general meeting of the above reconstruction association on November 17, 2012.

From around December 2, 2012 to January 2013, the Defendant received cash of KRW 30 million from the saidO from the Sungwon-si P, Sungwon-si P, Sungwon-si P, and KRW 30 million from the saidO in cash, and KRW 30 million from the saidO in the latter part of the Changwon-gu P, Sungwon-si P, Sungwon-si P during the period from June 2013 to July 2013.

Accordingly, the defendant received a bribe of KRW 90 million in total in relation to his duties under the pretext of the selection of a contractor from the aboveO in the status that is deemed as a public official.

Summary of Evidence

1. Each statement made by the witnessO in the protocol of public trial on the third and fourth occasions;

1. Statements made by the witness Q in the fifth public trial records;

1. Each protocol of examination of the suspect against the accused by the prosecution (including the replacement part of the suspect);

1. R to the preparation of a public prosecutor, copies of each protocol concerning the examination of a suspect against theO;

1. Details of S (T) transactions;

1. Matters of personnel orders;

arrow