1. The plaintiff's claims against the defendants are all dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Basic facts

A. The Plaintiff is entitled to the former Act on the Maintenance and Improvement of Urban Areas and Dwelling Conditions for Residents (amended by Act No. 11293, Feb. 1, 2012; hereinafter “former Act on the Maintenance and Improvement of Urban Areas and Dwelling Conditions for Residents”).

(1) The Daegu-gu A Apartment (hereinafter referred to as the “instant apartment”) may determine as the case may be.

(2) On February 11, 2010, Defendant B completed the establishment registration on March 12, 2010 after obtaining authorization from the head of the Daegu Metropolitan City Month, which was established for the purpose of the reconstruction project of a housing reconstruction project, the establishment of the association was decided on November 28, 2008, and the establishment was completed on March 12, 2010. (2) Defendant C is the real estate listed in paragraph (1) of the attached Table; Defendant C is the real estate listed in paragraph (2) of the attached Table; Defendant D is the real estate listed in paragraph (3) of the attached Table; Defendant E is the real estate listed in paragraph (4) of the attached Table; Defendant F is the sectional owners of the above apartment owned real estate listed in paragraph (5) of the attached Table; Defendant G is the real estate owners of the above apartment owned by the real estate listed in paragraph (6) of the attached Table; Defendant H leased leased from

B. On June 1, 2011, the Plaintiff notified Defendant B, C, D, E, F, G, and Nonparty I whether they would participate in the rebuilding of the Plaintiff association. A peremptory notice was sent to the effect that the Plaintiff would not participate in the rebuilding of the Plaintiff association without reply within two months from the date of receipt of the above peremptory notice, and that the above notice reached the Defendants and Nonparty I respectively, but the Defendants and I did not reply to whether they participated in the rebuilding within two months from the date of receipt of the above notice. (2) The Plaintiff filed the instant lawsuit on September 16, 201, and notified the Defendants that they would reply again about whether they agreed to the establishment of the association, and that the Plaintiff would exercise the right to demand sale at the same time was served on each of the Defendants around October 2011.