A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a space between the victim B (the age of 49) and C, the branch around June 2009, with the introduction of the defendant.

The Defendant knew that the victim operates the “E” located in the Nam-gu Seoul Metropolitan City, Ulsan Metropolitan City, and that the victim’s wife F was operating the “I workplace child care center” located in North-gu, North-gu, and the H elementary school located in the same city, and that the victim did not lend KRW 20 million to the victim on September 2009, even though there was no fact that the victim borrowed KRW 20 million from the victim, the victim would have borrowed KRW 20 million as a public official’s street loan, and demanded repayment. When the victim did not comply with the Defendant’s demand, the Defendant attempted to mislead the victim by threateninging the victim in a manner that seems to file an accusation against the expenses for the operation of the foundation in the Ulsan Metropolitan City, Busan Metropolitan City Office Inspector, and I, which supervised the said foundation and child care center.

Therefore, at around 10:53 on August 3, 2017, the Defendant found “I workplace child care center” operated by the above F, and the Defendant stated that “F lent KRW 20 million to B around September 2009, but does not repay, and is a married couple’s fraud group, and if not repaid the money, he/she would know to the principal of the HH school.” At that time, the Defendant provided the school support division in the Ulsan-gu Office of Education, social welfare division in Ulsan-gu, Ulsan-gu, Seoul-gu, the elderly welfare division, the elderly welfare division in the Ulsan-gu, the Ulsan-gu Women’s Welfare Department in the Ulsan-gu, the Ulsan-gu Women’s Welfare Department in the Ulsan-gu, the Ulsan-gu, the Ulsan-gu Women’s Welfare Department in the Ulsan-gu, and the auditor room in the Ulsan-gu, the Defendant did not lend KRW 20 million to B who operated the “E” around September 2009.

E knows the corruption of E.

“If the victim does not pay KRW 20 million to the purport, the victim would threaten the victim as if the operation of the said foundation and the childcare center was obstructed through the supervising authority, and would have attempted to receive KRW 20 million from the food victim, but the victim attempted to commit the crime at the wind that the victim did not comply with.

Accordingly, the defendant attempted to attack the victim and receive 20 million won, but did not achieve that intention, but did not commit an attempted crime.