1. Defendant A shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for one year and six months;

Provided, That the above punishment shall be imposed for three years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A on July 19, 2017, after having been sentenced to one year for a violation of the Labor Standards Act in Gangnam Branch Branch of the Chuncheon District Court, it is still pending in the court of appeal.

1. "Destruction property, etc. of Defendant A 2018 Highest 445";

A. On November 23, 2017, Defendant A found in the waiting room of the fishermen of the fishing village fraternity managed by the Victim K, which is located in L L at a three-dimensional speed around November 10:00, Defendant A, on the ground that the victim did not know about the Defendant’s monetary relationship and talked with the Defendant, Defendant A was at the 2nd door door of the market price of KRW 40,000,000, the market price of which was in a non-commercial manner, and was at the string of the floor.

Accordingly, Defendant A damaged the victim’s property.

B. On November 30, 2017, Defendant A found a blicker’s mar (54 m) managed by the victim M (54 mar) who is a relative with the n of the 9th floor of the O hotel in Twitner at Cham on March 30, 2017, Defendant A maintained a blick bar (120cm in length, about 50cm in thickness), which is a dangerous object at that place on the ground that the victim does not have a blar, and caused a 700,000 won of the market price managed by the victim.

As a result, Defendant A damaged the victim's property by carrying dangerous articles.

2) Defendant A 1-

B. 1) The date, time, and place mentioned in paragraph (1) and on the same ground, the victim M was the victim’s board (4kg), which is a dangerous thing in that place.

As a result, Defendant A, carrying dangerous objects, assaulted the victim.

(c)

Defendant A, on December 2, 2017, found in Q Q’s R restaurant operated by the victim P on March 2, 2017, Defendant A committed the crime against the victim P on the ground that he/she had a dispute with the victim during telephone conversations with the victim. Defendant A, on his/her hand, got the door door of the above restaurant entrance.