beta
Text
Defendants shall be punished by a fine of KRW 8,000,000.
Defendant
If A does not pay the above fine, it shall be 100.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
Defendant
B A Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as “Defendant B”) is a juristic person established in military F at the time of Mapoposi for the purpose of manufacturing equipment and core parts before semiconductors, and Defendant A is the representative director of Defendant B.
1. Defendant A
A. The aforementioned B related to the Korea Institute of Energy Technology Evaluation and Planning was involved in three detailed tasks, including “G (the project period from December 1, 09 to May 31, 13)”, “H (the project period from December 1, 209 to May 31, 200), and “I (the project period from November 30, 200),” and “I (the project period from June 1 to November 30, 200).”
A subsidy during the project period shall be paid in advance in accordance with the plan and shall be processed by the accounting firm entrusted by the Korea Institute of Energy Technology Evaluation and Planning in the way that the amount of the subsidy is determined as the final subsidy after undergoing an accounting audit on a yearly basis, but the subsidy was to be used only for the purpose of performing the relevant project.
On May 25, 2010, the Defendant, in collusion with the researchers and accounting officers in charge of the above tasks within the above company, received subsidies of KRW 124,922,00 on 31 occasions in total, as shown in the attached Table 1 of the crime list, by submitting a false tax statement as if he purchased parts related to the above business, as if he purchased parts related to the above business, and submitting a false tax statement as if he purchased parts related to the above business, and by making them included in the amount of business recognition in the accounting audit conducted by the accounting firm around that time.
Accordingly, the Defendant, in collusion with the above employees, received property by deceiving a person in charge of the settlement of subsidies, such as an accounting firm entrusted with the audit of the execution of subsidies, and at the same time received the subsidies by false application or other unlawful means as the representative director of the person who implements the subsidized project.