Defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for a term of one year and six months.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant was unable to pay the amount after the occurrence of a debt of KRW 240 million from around 2007 to around 2007, because it was unable to properly operate the entertainment store from around 2005 to around 2007. The Defendant was willing to borrow the amount from the victim, despite the absence of intent or ability to pay the amount despite borrowing the amount from the victim C.

1. Fraud;

A. On October 12, 201, the Defendant was working as the head of the office when receiving KRW 50,000,000 from the above entertainment place in the name of a member of Ansan-si, a member of Ansan-si, who was working for the head of the office around that time when he received from the above entertainment place an amount of KRW 50,000 from the said entertainment place under the pretext of the advance payment. The Defendant would lend the money to the female employees if the female employees were to use the bonds at a high interest rate if they were to lend money to the other employees.

“The phrase “ was false.”

However, even if the defendant borrowed money from the injured party, the defendant did not have any idea to lend it to female employees, and there was no intention or ability to pay the interest agreed upon to the injured party.

The Defendant received KRW 10 million from the injured party to the Agricultural Cooperative Account (Account Number D) under the name of the Defendant, and received KRW 118,890,000 in total from around that time to March 14, 2012 by means of the following methods: (a) the Defendant acquired money from the damaged party, as above, from the time of transfer to March 14, 2012.

B. The Defendant, at the time of around February 24, 201, paid the debt amount of KRW 240 million to KRW 20 million from the entertainment place to KRW 50 million under the name of the advance payment, and even if the Defendant borrowed the money from the said victim, he/she would pay the leased deposit within one year from the Jeju Sea where he/she paid the deposit by substitute, notwithstanding the fact that he/she did not have the intent or ability to pay the money from the said victim.

On the other hand, the victim paid 10,000,000 won for the room room.

Defendant 1’s act as above 7 times from around that time to September 6, 2013, as shown in attached Table 1(2).