logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2016.08.10 2016고단936
폭행치상
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

around September 26, 2014, the Defendant was sentenced to three years of imprisonment with prison labor for a violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes at the Seoul Southern District Court around September 26, 2014, and the judgment became final and conclusive around October 7, 2014, and is currently executing the sentence at the Child Training Institution at the Childbirth (741), and on February 12, 2016, at the confinement room located at the Child Vocational Training Institution at the 4th upper floor C above the eth floor of the ethic vocational training institution around 06:0 on February 12, 2016, the Defendant d (46 years of age) with the victim D (46 years of age) who was divingd from the Defendant’s side page, and was locked, and was locked as a result of this ethicul.

“I am the horses,” and then see why “I am Chewing, I am the starting cost from the suffering of the damage, and am the horses.”

The bitchch bitch bitch is neglected.

When “Abreging the victim’s face, knenee, 3,4 times the victim’s face is knee and knee, flad the victim’s face, she is placed on a back-to-face and in the opposite direction, and knee knee knee knee knee knee kne.

As above, Defendant assaulted the victim and suffered injury to the victim, such as Rascopic stremopic streake, which requires approximately three weeks of medical treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Statement of the police suspect interrogation protocol against the accused;

1. Statement in each police statement made to D and E;

1. To enter copies of the medical records;

1. Application of the relevant Acts and subordinate statutes described in the certificate of confinement and the judgment;

1. Relevant Article of the Criminal Act and Articles 262, 260 (1), and 257 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of punishment for a crime (opportune)

1. While the reasons for sentencing under Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act, it is not good to say that the defendant is serving in prison, the defendant's use of violence against other prisoners is not good. However, it is against the fact that the defendant is recognized as a substitute for the crime, which led to the crime of this case in contingency, and the victim is punished against the defendant.

arrow