1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. The following facts: (a) the Plaintiff’s nationality, or the Republic of Korea’s short-term stay status visit (C-3) on November 9, 2014 on the date of entry into the Republic of Korea; (b) the date of the application for refugee status recognition (hereinafter “instant disposition”); (c) January 28, 2016 on the date of the application for refugee status recognition; (c) the date of the decision on July 29, 2015; and (d) there is no dispute over the grounds for recognition of the decision to dismiss the decision on January 11, 2016 on the date of the application for objection that there is no sufficient ground for recognition of refugee status status: (a) the facts that there is no ground for recognition of the decision to dismiss the decision on October 11, 2017; and (b) the purport

2. Whether the instant disposition is lawful

A. The Plaintiff’s assertion is a national of the Republic of Ghana (hereinafter “AB”).

After the Plaintiff’s father died on November 2013, 2013, the Plaintiff’s father demanded that the Plaintiff be able to lead the Plaintiff’s father and the Plaintiff be able to be able to be able to be able to be able to become able to the

However, the plaintiff, who is a senior Do governor, refused to do so.

Accordingly, the above village development has threatened the plaintiff.

Accordingly, the plaintiff has been in the Republic of Korea regardless of Ghana.

As such, if the Plaintiff returned to Ghana, it should be recognized as a refugee, as it is likely to threaten the above village development.

B. Determination 1) Article 2 Subparag. 1 of the Refugee Act defines refugee status as “any foreigner who is unable to be protected or does not want to be protected by the country of nationality due to well-founded fear to recognize that he/she may be injured on the grounds of race, religion, nationality, status as a member of a specific social group, or political opinion, or is a stateless foreigner who is unable to return to or does not want to return to the country in which he/she had resided before entering the Republic of Korea due to such fear.” 2) When comprehensively considering the evidence and evidence set forth in subparagraph 3 as well as the following circumstances that can be known in addition to the purport of the pleading as a whole, the Plaintiff’s persecution on the grounds of race, religion, nationality, membership of a specific social group, or political opinion.