The Defendants’ appeal is dismissed.

1. The decision of the court below on the summary of the grounds for appeal (one year and two months of imprisonment, and six months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable;

2. On the other hand, there are favorable circumstances such as the fact that the defendant recognized the crime of this case, the defendant did not lead the crime of this case, and the profit acquired by the defendant from the crime of this case is not relatively large compared to the amount of defraudation. However, the crime of this case is a single scam crime and requires strict punishment because it is difficult to recover damage, and the victim of this case has reached 508,671,107 won (the amount of damage directly withdrawn by the defendant from the account in the name of the defendant is 478,671,107 won). However, the defendant cannot be deemed to have taken charge of the essential part in the crime of this case, such as the defendant's act of taking part in the crime of this case as a single scaming crime, the crime of this case cannot be deemed to have been somewhat less than the requisite part in the crime of this case, the defendant's act of suspended execution and sentence, the defendant's motive of the crime of this case's crime of this case's crime of this case's 2.

- Defendant B: The Defendant reflects the instant crime, and there are favorable circumstances such as the fact that the gains acquired by the Defendant from the instant crime are relatively little. However, the instant crime was delivered to the Bosing-out withdrawal book. The delivery of the Bosing-out passbook is a series of processes for the instant crime. The Defendant committed the instant crime during the period of suspension of execution, and the Defendant committed the instant crime during the period of suspension of execution.