logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2015.12.10 2013고정3753
사기
Text

The defendant shall be innocent.

Reasons

The summary of the facts charged is that the defendant, as the representative attorney of the law firm B, was indicted on the charge of violating the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Economic Crimes (Fraud), after having been charged with the violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Economic Crimes (Fraud) to the Jung-gu District Court on May 1, 2009. On June 1, 2009, the defendant succeeded to the case of the case of the case of the case of the acceptance of D and 90% of the contingent fees to the law firm C, and the 10% of the contingent fees to the law firm B. On June 17, 2009, the defendant, as the representative attorney of the law firm B, established the branch office of the law firm B in the 9th floor of the government building E-si, the office of the law firm, and succeeded to the case of

The F used the post of office in the law firm C or the branch office in the law firm B as an agent after D was detained on April 2009 and the F took overall charge of the management of employees and funds as D's wife.

Around September 25, 2009, the Defendant, through G at the above law firm C and its branch offices located on the 9th floor of the building E, the government of the Republic of Korea, at the time of the government around September 25, 2009, filed a lawsuit with the victim H and the victim I, upon delegation of the heir’s lawsuit that he would find the ground in the front line, delegated by the heir’s lawsuit. On the winning of the lawsuit, the Defendant would receive several parcels of land outside the J in Nam-si, Nam-si, Nam-si. The above J 1871 square meters may be reduced to KRW 170,000,000,000,000,000 won as the down payment, and at the same time, it would return the down payment if he/she loses the ownership transfer at the time of receipt of the remainder after the decision of winning the lawsuit.

However, the above fact did not have been delegated to the above J et al., and the above KRW 30 million was expected to be used for the payment of the staff's wages, etc., so there was no intention or ability to transfer the above J ownership or return the down payment to the victims.

arrow