beta
Text
Defendant
A shall be punished by a fine of KRW 10,000,00, and Defendant B and C by a fine of KRW 5,000,000, respectively.
The Defendants respectively.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
Defendant
A was in office as the responsible researcher of F&A, and was the former husband of G, and Defendant C was the mother of Defendant A, and Defendant B was the mother of Defendant A.
[2013dan626] - Defendant A, around August 26, 2010, with respect to KRW 257,500,000 lent by G from H around August 26, 201, the same year
9. He will make reimbursement on his behalf and prepare a notarial deed to the effect of joint and several sureties if H is not able to receive more than KRW 100 million by the time of 16.
‘‘(C) on September 20, 2010, a notary public, who is located in Osan-si, 653-1 of Jinsung Building, prepared a notarial deed stating that the said money is jointly and severally guaranteed by the law firm rate. H around November 22, 2010, the Suwon District Court received a seizure and collection order of the pay claim against the Defendant F Co., Ltd., by making the obligor A and the third obligor F Co., Ltd. the F Co., Ltd.’s obligation under the F Co., Ltd.’s F Co., Ltd.’s obligation is likely to continue compulsory execution. Accordingly, the Defendant prepared a notarial deed stating that Defendant C and B bear false obligation against the Defendant, and based on this, Defendant C and B would reduce the amount of distribution of the Defendant’s claim under the attachment and collection order against the Defendant F Co., Ltd., and Defendant C and B were publicly recruited by the Seoul High Court, Defendant C and 50, Defendant C-1 and B-15, Defendant C-5, and Defendant B-1 and B-5.
‘‘(A’s ‘‘(105,000,000 won was borrowed from C at the net Japanese joint law office where Defendant C and a notary public, around January 14, 201, 522 located at the net Japanese-si Municipal Ordinance, the notary public borrowed from C’s KRW 105,00.
“The” has drawn up a notarial deed of each monetary loan for consumption.
Accordingly, the Defendants conspired with each other to bear false liability H.