logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2016.11.24 2016고단2309
전자금융거래법위반등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[Criminal Power] On September 17, 2014, the Defendant was sentenced to two years of imprisonment with prison labor for an injury at the Seoul Eastern District Court, and the said judgment became final and conclusive on February 12, 2016.

【Criminal Facts】

In using and managing the means of access, no one shall transfer any means of access used in electronic financial transactions unless otherwise specifically provided for in any other Act.

On February 2, 2015, the Defendant received a proposal from a person who is unable to know his/her name to lend a passbook of KRW 300,000,000 from a person who is unable to know his/her name, and issued a passbook, cash card,OTP card, etc. to a bank account in the name of the corporation C (D) and transferred the means of access to notify his/her password.

Except as otherwise expressly provided for in any other Act, no person of "2016 Highest 2673" shall transfer any means of access used in electronic financial transactions.

On May 2015, the Defendant received a proposal from a person who is unable to know his/her name on the road near the market street in Bupyeong-gu Incheon Bupyeong-gu, Incheon, that he/she would lend a passbook of KRW 300,000,000 from a person who is unable to know his/her name, and issued a cash card in the name of the company E’s bank account (F) and transferred the means of access to the personal identification.

"2016 Highest 4057"

1. The Defendant, while making an Internet search while having been in need of money due to not good economic circumstances, was able to give KRW 300,000 per case at the time of transfer of passbook, and was able to receive the price by transferring passbooks, check cards, etc.

A person whose name cannot be known refers to a person who did not have the intent or ability to sell a spathization, and the victim G made a false statement that he/she would pay the purchase price of the spathization to the victim G on January 31, 2015. The Defendant is a stock company to a person whose name the above name is unknown.

arrow