1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of the lawsuit, including costs incurred by participation, are all assessed against the Plaintiff.

1. Details of the petition review and decision;

A. A. Around 2013, the Intervenor’s Intervenor (hereinafter “ Intervenor”) filed a civil petition on the irregularities and affiliated E professor at C University (hereinafter “instant school”) established and operated by the Intervenor’s Intervenor (hereinafter “ Intervenor”) filed a civil petition for the wrongful conduct of the following: “F professors, the chief of the department, granted credits to G students, unfairly collect money from students, and unfairly collect money from students.”

Accordingly, the instant school organized a fact-finding team and investigated the details of civil petitions, and prepared a fact-finding report on December 5, 2013 (hereinafter “the instant report”).

B. On February 22, 2014, after the Plaintiff was appointed as the president of the instant school, the Plaintiff received a report on the fact that a fact-finding survey was conducted on F professor and the results thereof, and confirmed the instant report at the time.

C. The police and the prosecution were investigated with respect to civil petitions against F professors;

On June 30, 2015, the head of the Suwon District Prosecutors' Office in the Suwon District Prosecutors' Office was prosecuted by F professor as the crime of interference with business, and on July 29, 2015, notified the result of the case disposition against F professor in the instant school on July 29, 2015 (Fraud: no suspicion exists, forgery of private documents: no suspicion is suspected, embezzlement is not suspected, interference with business: no charge is suspected, part of the charge is not suspected, and partial non-detained prosecution is not prosecuted).

The Minister of Education conducted an inspection of actual conditions of the instant school twice from November 29, 2016 to November 30, 2016, and from February 6, 2017 to February 8, 2017, and on March 15, 2017, the Minister of Education demanded an intervenor to take heavy disciplinary action against the Plaintiff on the ground of the following: (i) improper school affairs management; (ii) improper school affairs management; (iii) improper school personnel management; and (iv) manipulation of documents to meet the recruitment rate of school teachers; and (iv) unlawful school expenses disbursement related to the Foundation H (hereinafter “the Scholarship Foundation”).

On April 14, 2017, the intervenor filed an objection against the disposition of the inspection of actual status (including the actions of status against the plaintiff) by the Minister of Education.