A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for two years.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for three years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Criminal facts

1. On August 26, 2009, the Defendant issued a summary order of a fine of three million won for a violation of the Road Traffic Act (driving without a license) at a district district court of Jung-gu on August 26, 2009, and on November 3, 2011, a summary order of a fine of five million won for a violation of the Road Traffic Act (driving without a license) is issued at a district court of Jung-gu on November 3, 201 and has the record of driving under the influence of alcohol more than twice.

On February 14, 2012, at around 21:08, the Defendant driven a D car at 1 km from the front day of the main stream to the front day of the Namyang-si, Jyang-si, Jyang-si, with a blood alcohol concentration of 0.078% without a driver’s license.

2. On February 14, 2012, the Defendant violated the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (a collective injury by deadly weapons, etc.) operated the said car on the front side of the Jinyang-si, Jinyang-si, without temporarily stopping the said car from the E apartment room to the front side of the E apartment room without temporarily stopping it from the light of the luminous city, and then making it clear for the victim to face with the Gone Starsch car of the F (the age of 42) driving to face with the car at the time. While the dispute occurred, the Defendant was boarding the said car in order to report the Defendant’s drunk driving to the police.

The defendant examined the victim's right side of the above vehicle as his hand and prevented the vehicle, and when it is difficult to flee, the defendant moved the above vehicle, which is a dangerous object, into front of it as it is, and suffered about two weeks from the victim's right side part of the above vehicle, which was trying to avoid the vehicle into the front side of the above vehicle, and sustained the victim's injury, such as a hacke dye, in need of treatment for about two weeks.

3. The Defendant violated the Guarantee of Automobile Accident Compensation Act, as a holder of a D-car, operated the said automobile without mandatory insurance at the date and place specified in the said 1. Paragraph.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. The police statement concerning F;

1. The de facto survey report, the pictures related to the case, and the victim's vehicle.