logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2018.02.09 2017가합541736
손해배상(기)
Text

1. The Defendant’s KRW 126,00,000 as well as the Plaintiff’s annual 5% from March 21, 2013 to February 9, 2018, and the following.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. On April 16, 2012, the Plaintiff is an insurance company and the Defendant is an insurance solicitor, and the Plaintiff was acting as the Plaintiff’s insurance solicitor from that time by concluding an insurance solicitation contract with the Plaintiff on commission of insurance solicitation. (2) The Plaintiff and the Defendant concluded an agreement on the payment of piece rates arising from the creation of Preigency (hereinafter “instant piece rates agreement”) on March 20, 2012.

Article 5 (Payment Amount of Performance Rates and Requirements) The amount of performance-based incentives paid to MP (Insurance Solicitors) shall be the amount indicated below, and MP shall meet and maintain the following conditions for the fulfillment of each grade determined by the Company during the conclusion of this Agreement and the period of payment:

S Grade A B C special performance-based annual performance-based annual performance-based performance-based performance-based performance-based performance-based performance-based performance-based performance-based performance-based performance-based performance-based performance-based performance-based performance-based performance-based performance-based performance-based performance-based performance-based performance-based performance-based performance-based performance-based performance-based performance-based performance-based performance-based performance-based performance-based performance-based performance-based performance-based performance-based performance-based performance-based performance-based performance-based performance-based performance-based performance-based performance-based performance-based performance-based performance-based performance-based performance-based performance-based performance-based performance-based performance-based performance-based performance-based performance-based performance-based performance-based performance-based performance-based performance-based performance-based performance-based performance-based performance-based performance-based performance

(v) - There should be no violation of the provisions of all laws and regulations of the supervisory authority, including finance laws, and of the company regulations.

b. - If the departure experience of life insurance companies is not more than twice before. Article 7 (Reasons for Return of Performance Incentives and Time of Occurrence)

1. The MP shall return the piece rates already paid to the company, if the time when the cause for return of the piece rates arises falls under the period of the refund threshold below, and the base point of return shall be the date when this Agreement is concluded;

3) The main contents of the instant performance rate agreement are as follows. (B) The Defendant concluded a criminal judgment against the Defendant with the Korea Information Engineering Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Korea Information Engineering”) and 90 employees as insured.

arrow