1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The first instance court.

1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance for the acceptance of this case is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for the Plaintiff’s determination as to the contents asserted in the court of first instance as stated in the following paragraph (2). Thus, this is cited as it is in accordance with Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main sentence of

2. Additional determination as to the Plaintiff’s assertion

A. In the case of Jeju City F (G pent) and H (I pent) land (hereinafter referred to as “JJ in Jeju”) used as a lodging facility site similar to each of the instant lands claimed by the Plaintiff, the individual land price was calculated by setting the N land as the standard land price for the land.

Therefore, the development charges should be imposed on each land of this case as the reference land for N land.

B. According to the evidence Nos. 8 (including paper numbers; hereinafter the same shall apply), Nos. 8 and 9, it is recognized that F and H land was used as a site for accommodation facilities, and that the officially assessed individual land price of F and H land was calculated as the reference land price of N land.

However, according to the evidence Nos. 4, 10, and 18 as indicated below, since the N land differs from the reference land of this case in terms of land category and current use as indicated below, it cannot be deemed that it is more appropriate to select N land, other than the reference land of this case, as the reference land of this case.

Therefore, the defendant's above assertion is without merit.

In the surrounding environment where the land category of each land in this case is the current state of use of the land in question, the coastal farmland zone before the Nbelt in the natural green belt of the reference land in this case for the purpose of the land use zone, the green belt of the natural green land in this case and the commercial zone

3. In conclusion, the plaintiff's claim is dismissed as it is without merit, and the judgment of the court of first instance is just, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit, and it is so decided as per Disposition.