1. The Defendant’s KRW 17,234,620 as well as 5% per annum from April 7, 2018 to December 11, 2018 to the Plaintiff.

Facts of recognition

On December 17, 2003, the Plaintiff and the Defendant concluded a lease contract with a deposit of KRW 40 million and KRW 2 million per month for the instant building owned by the Plaintiff.

On January 31, 2012, the Plaintiff filed a lawsuit against the Defendant for a claim for the surrender of a building (U.S. District Court Decision 201Gahap2851). On January 31, 2012, the conciliation between the Plaintiff and the Defendant (hereinafter “instant conciliation”).

The details thereof are as shown in the attached protocol of mediation.

The Plaintiff filed a lawsuit against the Defendant seeking the payment of the rent for the instant adjustment, and the Suwon District Court, the appellate court of the instant case, rendered a judgment on September 6, 2017 that the Defendant shall pay to the Plaintiff 16,747,866 won in arrears and the annual interest rate of 5% from November 16, 2016 to September 6, 2017, as well as the annual interest rate of 15% from the next day to September 6, 2017 (U.S. District Court Decision 2017Na51495), and that the said judgment was finalized on September 23, 2017.

(Reasons for recognition) Facts without dispute, entries in Gap evidence 1 and 5 (including each number), and the purport of the whole pleadings.

The Plaintiff’s assertion by the Plaintiff did not pay KRW 31,70,000 among the rent accrued from June 2016 to April 1, 2018. As the Defendant had run an entertainment drinking house in the instant building, the property tax imposed heavy taxation on the Plaintiff in 2017 is KRW 2,918,172, and the Defendant did not pay KRW 5,386,90, which was a water rate for running the said entertainment drinking house.

In addition, the Defendant incurred water leakages of water pipes while running an entrance gate to entertainment tavern, and accordingly, the Plaintiff additionally charged KRW 1,463,710 for water supply fees.

In addition, the defendant did not operate fire-fighting facilities necessary for the operation of entertainment establishments, and the plaintiff installed fire-fighting facilities using the cost of 1,170,000 won instead of the plaintiff.

In addition, the defendant is against the plaintiff 16,047,966 won and this.