logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 부천지원 2015.11.18 2015고정485
업무방해등
Text

The sentence of punishment shall be suspended against the Defendants.

Of the facts charged in the instant case, the insult against Defendant A and F.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[Attachment] The Defendants are members of the H Apartment Housing Reconstruction Project Association (hereinafter “instant association”) in Bupyeong-si, Busan-si, and all of the members’ spouses have an interest in the H apartment reconstruction project, which is promoted in the first and fourth lots of land, and the J around January 2014 was the president of the said association, the victim K was the general director of the said association, and the victim L was the full-time employee of the said association.

With respect to the above H apartment reconstruction project, the instant association entered into a contract for a housing reconstruction project with the Hyundai Industrial Development Co., Ltd., a contractor (hereinafter referred to as the “Nuri Industrial Development”) on January 31, 2008 after obtaining authorization for project implementation from the Seocheon City on September 10, 2007, and entered into a contract for a housing reconstruction project with the share-based company.

However, from October 2008, modern industrial development is expected to increase construction cost due to price increase and interest rate increase, real estate market is expected to be a large loss due to the subsidence of the real estate market, and the share system, which is the business method stipulated in the above construction contract, was demanded to be changed to a contract system, and the reconstruction construction was suspended at that time.

Accordingly, the association of this case was divided into the proposal of modern industrial development from the perspective of the division of suffering to the point of view that it would not accept the proposal, and there was a conflict between one another and another, and then there was a dispute over the validity of the resolution of the general assembly as to whether to accept the proposal of modern industrial development.

In the meantime, on November 29, 2013, the Incheon District Court rendered a ruling that the effect of the resolution of the general assembly that has resolved to change the share system from the share system to the contract system is valid, and thereafter, the instant union appealed and proposed an additional share of KRW 89 billion in the development of modern industries during the appellate trial, and the special general meeting was called up on January 26, 2014, asking for whether to accept it.

【Criminal Facts】

The Defendants conspired with each other on January 25, 2014 to 20:00 on January 25, 2014, as the time between 16:00 and 20:00 of the same month.

arrow