logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2018.11.09 2018누35287
부당해고구제재심판정취소
Text

1. Revocation of the first instance judgment.

2. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

3. All costs of the lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. The grounds for the court's explanation of the instant case by the court of the first instance seems to be that "I" of the judgment of the court of the first instance, in the eight pages of the judgment of the court of the first instance, is a clerical error in S.

S appears to have re-entered to the Ministry of Telecommunications in 2008 after retirement, and it is not a conversion arrangement case.

The contents and disturbance related to the case shall be deleted, and the judgment of the court of first instance No. 2 shall be deleted.

C. Paragraph (2) (Article 1 and Paragraph (1) and 2 of the judgment of the court of first instance except where the part of the judgment of the court of first instance 7th or lower is cut down as follows:

(a) through (c);

1) Paragraph 1 of Article 8 of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act are as follows: (i) efforts to avoid dismissal, among the requirements for layoffs, means that all possible measures are taken to minimize the scope of dismissal by the employer, such as rationalization of management policy or work methods, prohibition of new employment, temporary retirement and voluntary retirement, and transfer of work, and the method and degree of such measures vary according to the degree of the management crisis of the relevant employer, managerial reasons for layoffs, contents and scale of the business, and number of personnel by class (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 201Da92148, Mar. 24, 2011). In this case, participants who participated in the National Health Insurance Corporation (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 2010Da92148, Mar. 24, 2011).

arrow