A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person engaged in the operation of a golf car.

1. On June 6, 2016, the Defendant violated the Road Traffic Act (after-accidents), the two-lanes of the road in front of the “E” located in Young-gu, Suwon-si, Suwon-si, Suwon-si, at around 02:10, followed the two-lanes of the road from the airspace of the shopping mall to the airspace of the air.

At the same time, GT-10 Oba and HT-100 Oba, the victim F, was parked on the two-lanes of the above road, and in such a case, the driver had a duty of care to look at the front and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and proceeded as it was, and the delivery box of the GT-100 Oral Ba was sent to the right-hand side of the Defendant’s passenger car by negligence over two-lanes.

Ultimately, the Defendant did not immediately stop and take necessary measures, even though he damages the two above Obaba, which is owned by the victim due to the above occupational negligence, to the sum of 320,000 won of the repair cost, such as the delivery box.

2. When the Defendant and the Defendant violated the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (i.e., an escapeing vehicle) and the Road Traffic Act (i.e., an accident) have escaped as above, the road of 7 lanes in front of the long distance of 50 U.S. Cheongwon-si, Suwon-si, Suwon-si, Seoul Special Metropolitan City, along the five-lanes of the 50-lane wide distance from the territorial interpretation room.

In this case, the driver has a duty of care to prevent accidents by accurately manipulating the steering system and the steering system and the steering system in the vicinity of the intersection where signal lights are installed.

Nevertheless, the defendant is negligent in doing so and is driving by the victim I(36) who was in the atmosphere of signal in the front bank due to negligence.