A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On July 6, 2015, the Defendant: (a) from the E-line operated by the Victim D in Ansan-si, Seoul, around 23:00, and the victim passed.

6. around 24. Around 24. Around the same day, Defendant filed a complaint on the grounds that he was investigated by the police due to business obstruction, indecent act by compulsion, etc., and the victim interfered with the victim’s bar business by force, such as the victim’s desire to engage in drinking alcohol at the above establishment, and the victim’s bar business by force.

Summary of Evidence

1. Application of each police protocol to D and F

1. Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the crimes and Article 314 of the Election of Imprisonment;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Reasons for sentencing under Article 62-2 (1) of the Criminal Act, Article 59 of the Act on Probation, etc.;

1. Scope of recommendations: Imprisonment for one month to eight months; and

(a) Type 1 (Interference with Business) and reduction area (one to eight months);

(b) No person subject to special mitigation (including voluntary efforts to recover damage);

2. The sentencing conditions, such as the age, character and conduct, environment, etc. of the defendant, are not good in light of the motive for the crime, etc. of sentencing, but the defendant and the victim have reached a unanimous agreement.