Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 700,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

On September 24, 2015, the Defendant: (a) driven a private taxi on September 24, 2015, while driving along one lane in the direction of the shooting distance of the daily church in the area of the common distance of Man-si, the wife, who driven by the victim D (54 tax, female) driven by the victim D (54) who driven on the two-lanes in the direction of the daily church. In the future, the Defendant kiddded the vehicle in front of the low-pollution vehicle volume.

The defendant continued to walk up the victim's vehicle by using a two-lane without participating in the fire, and added the victim's vehicle from the shooting distance of the Japanese church, and opened a window without any justifiable reason after driving the following vehicle, and expressed the victim's desire.

At this time, the Defendant temporarily stopped the vehicle on the one-lane in the direction of smooth traffic distance, and then threatened the victim by taking a bath about the victim who followed the vehicle.

Accordingly, the defendant threatened the victim to a taxi, which is a dangerous object.

Summary of Evidence

1. The defendant's legal statement (as at the date of the second public trial, in the case);

1. Statement made by the police against D;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes concerning booms and video records of vehicles submitted by victims, and booms and video records of vehicles submitted by suspects;

1. Relevant Article 284 of the Criminal Act, Articles 283(1) and 283 of the Criminal Act, the choice of fines concerning the crime, and the selection of fines;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The punishment shall be imposed by reducing the amount of fine prescribed by the summary order in consideration of the circumstances, such as the fact that the defendant agreed smoothly with the victim for the reason of sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, and that the defendant reflects his mistake.