A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On April 26, 2015, around 21:30 on April 26, 2015, the Defendant: (a) in front of the police box located in Western-gu B, Western-gu; (b) in front of the case of assaulting D or E, the Defendant, after receiving 112 reports on the case of assaulting D or E, demanded the victim F to board the patrol boat and take it off from the patrol boat; and (c) the victim F to take it off from the patrol boat.

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers concerning the handling of 112 reported duties.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. A protocol concerning the police interrogation of the accused;

1. Statement of the police statement concerning F;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to arrest and report cases;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act and the choice of imprisonment with prison labor concerning the crime;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act suspended execution. Article 62 (1) of the same Act

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act * The defendant's crime of this case falls under the category 1 of the obstruction of performance of official duties (in cases of obstruction of performance of official duties and coercion of duties). The degree of violence, intimidation, and deceptive scheme is minor. The crime of this case also falls under the category 1 of the obstruction of performance of official duties (in cases of suspension of performance of official duties and coercion of duties), the crime of this case is committed again.* The crime of this case is committed again in the same crime