1. All appeals filed by the plaintiff and the defendant are dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by each party.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

1. Facts of recognition;

A. With respect to A food 607 vehicle (hereinafter “Plaintiff vehicle”), the Defendant is an insurer who has concluded each automobile insurance contract with respect to B rocketing vehicle (hereinafter “Defendant vehicle”).

B. On October 31, 201, at around 18:25, the Plaintiff’s vehicle passed the intersection in front of the illegal 2-dong, Busan Jin-gu, Busan, by a vehicle vehicle: Provided, however, the Plaintiff’s vehicle’s left-hand side of the Defendant’s vehicle, which attempted to change the lane from the Plaintiff’s vehicle to the driving lane, and the Plaintiff’s side of the driver’s seat, was in contact with the Plaintiff’s vehicle.

(hereinafter referred to as “instant accident”). C.

On March 25, 2015, the Plaintiff paid KRW 1,602,000 insurance money to the repair company at the repair cost of the Plaintiff’s vehicle.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1, 2, 4, 5, Eul evidence Nos. 1 and 2 (including paper numbers) or the purport of the whole pleadings

2. The assertion and judgment

A. The plaintiff asserts that the accident in this case occurred as one negligence by the driver of the defendant vehicle in the intersection where the change of the lane was prohibited. The defendant asserts that the driver of the plaintiff vehicle also operated the direction direction, etc., while the driver of the vehicle in this case, the driver of the vehicle did not yield the vehicle to the defendant vehicle and did not proceed as it is.

B. According to the above findings of the determination, the instant accident was caused by negligence by the Defendant’s driver who attempted to leave the intersection where the change of lanes is prohibited.

I would like to say.

However, according to the statements and images in Eul's Nos. 1 and 2, it is recognized that vehicles were driven by the vehicle at the time of the accident in this case due to the crosssection, and that the defendant vehicle attempted to change the lane with the plaintiff vehicle in full while operating the direction direction, etc., and the driver of the plaintiff vehicle finds the defendant vehicle that attempted to change the lane late later, the driver of the vehicle in this case shall reduce the speed so as to prevent the collision or stick.