1. Of the judgment of the court of first instance, the part of the Plaintiff’s claim against the Defendants is modified as follows.

2. The plaintiff

1. Facts of recognition;

A. The Plaintiff is an insurance agency’s business purpose. B is the head of the Plaintiff’s F Branch (hereinafter “instant branch”). The Defendants work as an insurance solicitor at the instant branch from March 2016 to November 201, and left to another insurance company.

The Defendants, around March 2016, prepared and executed each agreement (hereinafter referred to as “each agreement of this case”) with the following contents to B, and entrusted the same to a notary public, and obtained certification thereof. 1. The representative branch head (B) of the representative branch office (B) of this case did not purchase a guaranteed insurance policy because the credit rating of the designer falls short of that of the designer, and thus issued a promissory note as a substitute.

2. Personal monetary accidents during the period of service are responsible for a designer.

3. The liability shall be borne when the liability arises due to extremely poor maintenance during the service period.

4. With respect to the above paragraphs 1 and 2 above, when the amount of recovery occurs due to the failure to maintain the subscription agreement, etc., it shall be returned without delay and when the amount of recovery is not returned, there shall be no objection to compulsory execution under the notarial deed of a promissory note.

다. 원고의 수당규정에는 아래의 내용이 포함되어 있음. ▣ 기본원칙 ◐ 본 규정 적용시기 : 2014. 4. 업적부터 ◐ 업적성과, 조직육성, 복리후생 수당 기준업적 : 합산 조정정산 - 정산업적 : 기준업적 - 환수업적 가산업적 ◐ 지급일 현재 해촉(해지) 업무정지자에 대해서는 제수당 부지급 ◐ 정산수당 우선공제 - 각종 수당환수가 발생하면 차후 지급되는 수당에서 정산하며, 이때 법령으로 정한 경우를 제외하고는 회사는 정산의 우선권을 가짐

D. The amount to be recovered calculated in accordance with the Plaintiff’s allowance regulations as part of the insurance contracts recruited by the Defendants have been invalidated, cancelled, reduced, or withdrawn is KRW 18,690,710 in the case of Defendant C, and KRW 3,013,408 in the case of Defendant D, as shown in the attached Table. 【No dispute exists”, “No. 1”, “No. 2, and “No. 3”, and “No. 2,” respectively.