A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

Punishment of the crime

[The Defendant, on October 15, 2015, was sentenced to one year and eight months of imprisonment for fraud at the Seosan Branch of the Daejeon District Court on September 7, 2017, and the said judgment became final and conclusive on September 7, 2017.

[2018 Highest 1676] On September 2, 2013, the Defendant would allow the victim E, who is the actual operator of the Dispute Resolution Co., Ltd. Co., Ltd., operated by the Defendant around 14:00, in the office of the Dispute Resolution Co., Ltd., which was operated by the Defendant around 14:00, to undertake a FL model model for the FL model under the supervision of the Corporation Co., Ltd., in the face of KRW 70,000,000.

The phrase “ makes a false statement.”

However, in fact, since the above industrial complex was not entirely scheduled, the defendant did not have the intent or ability to permit the victim to take the dormitory model housing construction of the above industrial complex, and the defendant did not have the intent or ability to pay the construction cost to the victim because he borrowed 200 million won from G did not pay the debt of the above industrial complex.

The defendant shall belong to the same month from the injured party.

9. Although the interior works were provided from March 1 to April 14 of the same month, the payment was not made.

Accordingly, the defendant, by deceiving the victim, acquired financial benefits equivalent to KRW 70 million of construction cost by deceiving the victim.

[2018 Highest 2378] Defendant sent KRW 30,000,000 as activity expenses to Defendant Ha in August 2015, 2015, for the purpose of raising business funds of KRW 7 billion to Defendant H.

different types.

The phrase “ makes a false statement.”

However, even if the victim receives money from the victim, there was no intention or ability to raise business funds equivalent to 7 billion won for the victim.

On August 21, 2015, the Defendant received 30 million won from the damaged party to the account transfer to the I Bank Account in the name of the Fund in charge of the settlement of accounts (number: J) in the name of the Fund in charge of operating expenses.

Accordingly, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim, acquired property benefits equivalent to the above amount.

[2018 Highest 3158] Defendant is operated by the victim L in Seocho-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government K around October 23, 2013.