A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

An applicant for compensation shall be dismissed.

Punishment of the crime

On July 6, 2016, the Defendant was sentenced to eight months of imprisonment for fraud at the Seoul Central District Court on July 6, 2016, and completed the execution of the sentence at the Seoul Southern Prison on October 21, 2016.

1. On April 16, 2017, the Defendant: (a) opened a multi-household house where the victim D, located in Suwon-si, Suwon-si, Suwon-si, Seoul-si, in Suwon-si, in which the victim D, located; (b) opened a non-Correctionable gate and intrudes into the multi-household Ma; (c) the victim, who is the victim’s Ma, installed at the same place, habitually stolen the victim’s property by having one bicycle with the victim’s market value equivalent to KRW 1.3 million, which is the victim’s ownership.

2. On July 10, 2017, the Defendant: “Around 02:14 on July 10, 2017, the 2017 Highest 5805,” “H in Suwon-si G located in Suwon-si, Suwon-si, where the victim I, an employee of the Defendant, was locked, with a gallon 5 mobile phones in the market value equivalent to KRW 400,000, the victim’s market value on the seat of the carcter.

Defendant from that time to that time,

8. From around 14:50 on December 19, 2017, an application for permission to amend the Bill of Indictment submitted by a prosecutor equivalent to the total market value of 8,339,500 won on a total of 12 occasions, as shown in the list of crimes in the annexed crime, is stated as “the total market value of 6,559,500 won over ten times in the same manner.” However, in light of the content of the application for permission to amend the Bill of Indictment of October 25, 2017 and the evidence record, “the total market value of 8,339,500 won in the same way over twelve times in total” appears to be written as “the total market value of 12 times in the same manner is deemed to have no substantial disadvantage to the defendant’s exercise of his/her right to defense even if the correction is made, it shall be recognized ex officio as identical to the facts charged.

The mobile phone, wallets, etc. were habitually stolen.

Summary of Evidence

"2017 Highest 4094"

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Written statements prepared in D;

1. Each investigation report (to listen to the statements by the informant, to check CCTV images for crime prevention near the damaged site, and to check K CCTV images).