logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2016.08.30 2016고정1995
위증
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of three million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On August 12, 2014, the Defendant appeared as a witness of the Defendant’s violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Economic Crimes (Fraud) as to Defendant B, etc., including the above court No. 2013 Gohap 1424, at the court of 320, Seocho-gu Seoul Central District Court, Seocho-gu, Seoul, Seoul, which was located in 1701-1, Seocho-gu.

Defendant Co., Ltd. stated that “A witness directly prepares documents from Defendant B” by the said defense counsel “I will give a few percent of the documents.”

If three persons, such as D, have been recruited, or if requested by anyone.

“I receive request from E” for the question “.”

The answer to “,” and the counsel’s proposal to pay 1% of the amount drawn up to the witness is not required by E, but required to authorize Defendant B.

“E” for the question “E”.

“The answer was made.”

However, the Defendant directly received a proposal from B to “to grant a false prepaid loan to employees of entertainment establishments as security for the so-called “specialized loan for entertainment establishments” that the bank granted to employees of entertainment establishments located in Gangnam, and, upon receiving the instructions from B, E was merely an act of preparing false prepaid cash documents and paying a false prepaid cash completion to the applicants, and the Defendant was well aware of the fact.

Accordingly, the defendant made a false statement contrary to his memory and raised perjury.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by each prosecutor to E;

1. Each protocol of examination of witness (as evidence Nos. 9, 13);

1. Each protocol of public trial (the sequence 8, 12);

1. Article 153 of the Criminal Act regarding mitigation of confessions does not apply to a defendant who applies statutes on March 25, 2016, since he/she led to confession of perjury by the prosecution on March 25, 2016.

1. Article 152(1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the relevant criminal facts and Article 152(1) of the same Act that requires the choice of punishment.

arrow