logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 전주지방법원 군산지원 2013.07.17 2013고단649
정보통신망이용촉진및정보보호등에관한법률위반(명예훼손)등
Text

The sentence of sentence against the defendant shall be suspended.

The list of seized articles in total shall be confiscated as provided for in subparagraphs 1 through 3.

(e).

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On October 27, 2012, the defendant filed a divorce lawsuit with the Jeonju District Court on the judgment of the defendant as the victim B (n and 47 years of age) and the husband and wife's death, and is currently in a divorce lawsuit.

1. Violation of the Act on the Protection and Use of Location Information;

A. On October 2012, the Defendant: (a) prepared a cell phone in advance to store the left side goods within the straight line between the victim’s ladice car operated by the victim in the Dosan-si, Gunsan-si; and (b) registered the cell phone on the “child-friendly search for an additional service provider using a cell phone owned by the Defendant; and (c) collected the location information on the said vehicle operated by the victim without the consent of the victim.

B. On November 7, 2012, the Defendant: (a) installed a location tracking device purchased via the Internet in the exhaust box of a frist vehicle owned by the victim, which was parked in front of the studio in the Gun, Simsan-si; and (b) collected the location information on the said vehicle operated by the victim without the consent of the victim with a smartphone linked to the location tracking device.

2. Violation of the Protection of Communications Secrets Act;

A. On September 2012, the Defendant attempted to record conversations between the victim and others not disclosed by installing a tape recorder on the lower side of the driver’s frist car, a victim owned by the victim, who was parked in front of the arm’s length of Simsan-si E in early September 2012. However, the Defendant attempted to record the conversations between the victim and others, which was perceived by the victim.

B. On September 1, 2012, the Defendant heard the conversations between the victim and F not open to the public by checking the voice files of black boxes installed in the victim’s studio car, which was parked in front of the said Eudio.

C. On September 2012, 2012, the Defendant 2-B at the Gunsan Support located in the Gunsan-si, Sinsan-si.

The recording of the conversation of another person, which has come to his knowledge, shall be made public after submitting a record as evidence of a divorce lawsuit.

arrow