All appeals by the Defendants are dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal is unreasonable because each punishment (7 million won per fine) declared by the court below to the Defendants is too unreasonable.

2. The fact that Defendant A recognized all of the instant crimes and reflected his mistake is favorable to the Defendants.

On the other hand, each crime of this case is committed against the defendants, even though they are commissioned as members of the Local Construction Industry Development Committee, in light of the legislative intent of the Framework Act on the Construction Industry that aims to promote the proper execution of construction works and the sound development of the construction industry, each crime of this case is committed against the defendants, even though they are commissioned as members of the Local Construction Industry Development Committee.

In full view of the aforementioned circumstances, the motive, means, and consequence of the crime, and the circumstances after the crime, etc., various circumstances constituting the conditions for sentencing as shown in the instant records and pleadings, it cannot be deemed that the lower court’s respective sentence imposed on the Defendants is too unreasonable.

3. In conclusion, the Defendants’ appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the Defendants’ appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.