Defendant

A A shall be punished by a fine of KRW 7 million and by a fine of KRW 5 million, respectively.

The above fines are imposed by the Defendants.

Criminal facts

1. Violation of the Act on the Punishment, etc. of Arrangement, etc. of Commercial Sex Acts (referring to brokerage, etc. of commercial sex acts), Defendant A operated the Ulsan-gu E 2nd floor from around December 25, 2017 to March 2, 2018, with Defendant B as a general manager and employed five female employees, including G, as a general manager, and had them pay 120,000 won among them to female employees.

As a result, Defendants conspired to act as commercial sex acts such as brokerage.

2. Defendants in violation of the Immigration Control Act employed five female employees as indicated in the crime list, including employment of G from December 23, 2017 to March 2, 2018, who did not have the status of stay in which they would engage in employment activities in the said F speech room as female employees.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. A protocol concerning the examination of each police suspect against H and I;

1. Each police statement to J or K;

1. Each written statement of L and M;

1. Photographs, protocol of seizure, N dialogue, content of message, and table of sales;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes for investigation reporting;

1. The Defendants of the relevant criminal facts: Article 19(2)1 of the Act on the Punishment, etc. of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic, Article 94 Subparag. 9 and Article 18(3) of the Immigration Control Act, Article 30 of the Criminal Act, and selection of fines

1. Defendants who are subject to aggravated concurrent crimes: the former part of Article 37, Article 38(1)2 and Article 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Defendants to be detained in the workhouse: Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act;

1. Defendant A: Article 25 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts, such as Arranging sexual traffic;

1. Defendants of the provisional payment order: The reason for sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act is that the Defendants engaged in the act of arranging sexual traffic by employing illegal staying persons in China as female employees, and it is not good to commit the crime, and it is reasonable to severely punish sexual traffic business establishments as serious social harm. However, the Defendants reflect each of the crimes of this case, and the business period and profits.