logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2015.11.25 2015가합9290
손해배상(기)
Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. The copyright, the printing right, the portrait, the broadcasting right, the broadcasting right, and the editing right of all programs produced by the Defendant (the programs produced up to the present and all programs produced in the future) under Article 3 of the facts of recognition are against the Defendant. Upon the Plaintiff’s request, the Defendant shall broadcast by editing the part of the Plaintiff’s broadcast.

Article 4. At the time of the formation of this Agreement, the content certification sent by the plaintiff to the defendant ( July 16) is insignificant, and neither criticism nor civil nor criminal prosecution is filed against each other in the future, nor criticism or civil or criminal prosecution is filed against the persons related to the defendant (shareholders, executive officers, employees, etc.).

Article 5 The terms and conditions of this Agreement shall not be disclosed or disclosed to a third party and, if leaked, shall be responsible to the part of the divulgence for the damage incurred.

On July 30, 2008, the Plaintiff contributed to the program produced by the Defendant and the Anet Entertainment, an external producer of the Defendant, and the Plaintiff entered into a special contribution agreement set forth in total 30 times from July 30, 2008 to July 29, 201, the contract term of the contract is from July 30, 2008 to July 29, 201, the down payment is KRW 55 million for the down payment, the amount of the contribution is KRW 1 million per time, and the frequency of the contribution.

The contents relating to this case in the above contract are as follows:

(hereinafter referred to as the “instant contract”) B.

The instant contract was implicitly extended twice as follows, and accordingly, the Plaintiff contributed to the broadcast produced by the Defendant, as indicated below in the “number of contributions” column.

Under the instant contract, the Defendant paid the Plaintiff the following amount of contribution as indicated in the “contribution” column. On March 16, 2015, the Defendant deposited KRW 9,000,000 (i.e., the annual contribution fee of KRW 1,000,000 x 9 times) with the Plaintiff as the depositee, and with the sum of the amount of contribution for the portion of the eight-minutes and the portion of the first extension contract that was not contributed under the instant contract.

The amount of contributions to the frequency of the divisional contract duration (cost) shall be July 30, 2008.

arrow