logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울남부지방법원 2016.01.20 2015고정1577
사기
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

If the defendant fails to pay the above fine, 100,000 won shall be one day.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[Criminal record] On June 19, 2015, the Defendant was sentenced to six years and six months of imprisonment for fraud, etc. at the Seoul Southern District Court on September 15, 2015, and the said judgment became final and conclusive on September 15, 2015.

[Criminal facts] The Defendant is a person who runs the “C” office on the second floor of Yeongdeungpo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government.

On August 31, 2010, the Defendant, at the above C Office, lent money to the victim D to the victim “E to lend money in need of money. F’s housing, the Defendant entered into a lease agreement with a deposit amount of KRW 400 million.

It is the denial of friendship, and it is well known.

The term "" refers to the lessor F, the lessee E, and the lease deposit amount of KRW 400 million were presented as security for the lease contract of Jongno-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government 201.

However, in fact, E did not have concluded a lease agreement with the above G 201 with a deposit of KRW 400 million, and the defendant was thought to use the above lease agreement with the victim as office operating expenses by receiving money from the victim.

The Defendant, as such, by deceiving the victim, received from the victim, a transfer of KRW 18 million to the SC bank account under the name of C on August 31, 2010.

In addition, the defendant, at the above C office on September 1, 2010, lent money to the victim D for the need of H money, and entered into a lease agreement at the I's house.

It shall be well known to the State.

The term "" refers to "the lessor I and the lessee H" presented the Mapo-gu Seoul Mapo-gu J Lease Contract as security.

However, in fact, H did not have concluded a lease agreement with respect to the above J house, and the defendant was thought to use the above false lease agreement as office operating expenses by receiving money from the damaged party.

The Defendant, as such, by deceiving the victim, received from the victim, a transfer of KRW 19.4 million to the SC bank account under the name of C on September 1, 2010.

In this respect, the defendant deceivings the victim and deceiving him.

arrow