1. Revocation of the first instance judgment.

2. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

3. All costs of the lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Quotation of the first instance judgment

A. The reasons for this Court concerning this case are as follows.

(2) in paragraph (2) shall be amended or added as described in

C. 2) Part of the judgment of the court of first instance (the 3rd 11th ~16th 2th 16th 2th 2th 2th 2th 2th 2th 2th 3th 3th 3th 3th 3th 2th 2th 2th 2th 2th 15th 2th 12th 2th 15th 2th 2th 2th 10th 2th 2th 2th 2th 2th 2th 3th 2th 2th 2th 2th 3th 2th 2th 2th 3th 2th 2th 2th 2nd 2nd 2nd 2nd 2nd 2nd 2nd 2nd 3th 2nd 2nd 2nd 3th 2nd 3th 2nd 3th 2nd 2nd 3th 2nd 2nd 3th 2nd 2nd 2nd 20

The following shall be added to the 3rd 10th son of the first instance judgment:

In order to clearly determine the type of pneumoconiosis of the plaintiff at the trial court, this court again entrusted the appraisal of medical records, and the main parts of the appraisal results sent by the President of the Korean Cinematographic Medical Center are as follows:

[The volume, distribution, etc. of this Section] From the Plaintiff’s chest simple radiation taken on July 24, 2012 at an Ansan Hospital, the Plaintiff’s chest scarbed on the upper part of the right side (hereinafter “part A”) and the Plaintiff’s chest scarbed on the upper part of the upper part of the right side of the road (hereinafter “part B”), and ② a relatively clear small small small and small small and small small and medium scarbing on the scarbing in the scarbing field (hereinafter “part B”). The Plaintiff’s chest scarbic image taken on August 20, 2012 at an Ansan Hospital at the Gatoo Seoul University Hospital and the Plaintiff’s chest scarbic radiation taken on October 29, 2012, there is no significant change in the volume and distribution of the scarb in this part.