logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2015.04.08 2014나41147
손해배상
Text

1. The part against the defendant in the judgment of the first instance shall be revoked;

2. The plaintiff's claim corresponding to the above revocation part.

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition;

A. The Plaintiff, through SING (H.K) LIMFD, imported 158.024 tons of pentas used for mushroom cultivation from an enterprise located in India (the name of the company is AMITRA FOSS PURE PEE LITRD) located in Hong Kong, a Hong Kong-based corporation located in Hong Kong-based food corporation, and paid the above amount to USD 49,777.56 under the terms including freight (C&F, seller’s uniform and enter into a contract of carriage with the carrier).

B. Around May 12, 2013, the above-mentioned 158.024 tons were delivered to the United Nations (NYK Line) in India, and the UNFCCC issued a bill of lading as a carrier on May 15, 2013, and the above bill of lading was finally delivered to the Plaintiff.

한편 실제로 위 옥수수를 운송하는 선박은 STX팬오션 주식회사 소속의 선박이었다.

다. 엔와이케이라인의 대한민국 내 대리점인 피고는 원고에게 위 옥수수의 도착예정일시를 2013. 6. 9.로 통지하였으나, STX팬오션 주식회사의 채권자가 중국에서 위 선박을 압류하는 바람에 위 옥수수는 2013. 7. 28.경에서야 국내에 도착하여 원고에게 인도되었다.

[Ground of recognition] Gap evidence 1, 2, Gap evidence 8-3, Gap evidence 15, and the purport of the whole pleadings.

2. The plaintiff's assertion

A. The defendant is a branch of the carrier, the carrier, and is liable for damages to the plaintiff with respect to delayed arrival of garments as the carrier.

The defendant shall bear the liability due to delayed arrival of cargo in accordance with Article 115 of the Commercial Act unless he proves that a forwarding agent has not neglected his duty of care concerning the selection of a carrier.

나. 피고는 운송인 또는 운송주선인의 지위와 상관없이 엔와이케이라인과 맺은 대리점계약에 의하여 엔와이케이라인에게 STX팬오션 주식회사의 어려운 재정적인 상황 등에 관하여 보고하여 위...

arrow