logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2016.06.03 2015누48664
국회발언취소등
Text

1. Of the judgment of the court of first instance, the Defendant’s request for correction to the NAVV Co., Ltd. on October 23, 2014 (defluence) is revoked.

Reasons

1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance concerning the instant case is as stated in Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act, and Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act, citing Articles 1 through 4 of the judgment of the court of first instance in accordance with the main text of Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act

2. Re-written part of the judgment of the court of first instance (from 3 to 18, the fifth to tenth of the judgment of the court of first instance) “The plaintiff asserts that the part of the claim for revocation of each of the instant sanctions against the defendant is lawful, since the Korea Communications Commission is the nominal owner of the disposition and the defendant actually took each of the instant sanctions. However, the defendant asserts that the revocation of each of the instant sanctions against the defendant is lawful.

(B) The part of the claim for cancellation against the Defendant, who is not the authority of the disposition of each of the instant sanctions, is unlawful. The Defendant’s request for deletion of the instant objection was made against the provider of information and communications services, and the Defendant’s request for deletion of the instant objection was made against the provider of information and communications services, and the person who posted the instant notice, which is the subject of the request for deletion of the instant request, is not the Plaintiff, but K, which is not the Plaintiff.

The plaintiff is merely an Internet user who asserts the same opinion as the notice of this case, and only has an indirect interest in the correction of the deletion of this case, and there is no legal interest in seeking the revocation thereof.

2. Article 8 (2) of the Enforcement Decree of the Illegal Illegal Law is a kind of request for correction, ① to delete or block access to the relevant information.

arrow