The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal is too unreasonable that the penalty imposed by the court below on the defendant (three million won of a fine) is too unreasonable.

2. The judgment is based on the following circumstances: (a) the Defendant first committed the instant crime; (b) the Defendant has a deep depth of his mistake; (c) the motive and background leading up to the instant crime; (d) there are some favorable circumstances for the Defendant, such as the Defendant appears to have committed the instant crime; and (c) the Defendant appears to have committed the instant crime in a contingent manner; (d) the Defendant has a considerable economic situation in the absence of occupation; (c) the lower court appears to have partially reduced the fine prescribed in the summary order, taking into account such circumstances into account; and (d) there are extenuating circumstances, such as the Defendant’s failure to receive a letter from the victim or have agreed to do so; and (e) other factors of sentencing as indicated in the records, including the degree of defamation, including the degree of defamation of the victim; (d) the circumstances after the commission of the instant crime; (e) the Defendant’s age, character, and conduct after the commission

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the ground that it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.